• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer UHP vs. Federal Evoluzion ST-1

# Sava Intensa UHP 2
/63%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
/43%
Federal Evoluzion ST-1
/31%

Add to comparison

Sava
Kleber
Federal
DimensionsR17 - R20 R17 - R20 R16 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

```html
Comparing two popular summer tyres, Sava Intensa UHP 2 and Kleber Dynaxer UHP, can help us understand their strengths and weaknesses. As per tyre test data, noticeable differences can be identified between these two.


Sava Intensa UHP 2 comes from the prestigious Sava brand, a successor to the previous model, Sava Intensa UHP. The tyre has a 67% rating in our test. It scored the 17th position in Autobild test among total 53 tyres.


Strengths of the Sava Intensa UHP 2 include short dry braking distances, low rolling resistance, and an attractive price. However, it underperforms in wet and dry handling, indicating a tendency to understeer. Also, its aquaplaning reserve is modest, suggesting it may struggle in heavy rain.


On the other hand, Kleber Dynaxer UHP comes from the renowned Kleber brand, holds 15th position in the same Autobild test. Our tests rated it at 48%.


Its strengths include low exterior noise, providing a quiet and comfortable ride, and impressive high mileage performance. It also features low rolling resistance, contributing to better fuel efficiency. However, Kleber Dynaxer UHP falls short when it comes to grip and lateral support in wet conditions. Like Sava, it too has little tolerance for aquaplaning.


In conclusion, while Sava Intensa UHP 2 offers a strong price-value ratio and is perfect for dry conditions, Kleber Dynaxer UHP promises silent performance and impressive mileage. However, neither of the tyres excel when it comes to wet grip or aquaplaning resistance.


Therefore, if you prioritise value for money, dry condition performance or short dry braking distances, Sava Intensa UHP 2 should be your choice. But for those seeking high mileage performance and quiet ride, the Kleber Dynaxer UHP could be the better option.
```
Keep in mind that these conclusions are based on our test data. Each tyre’s performance may vary depending on the specific vehicle, driving conditions, or individual driving style. Always remember to match the right tyre for your specific usage needs.

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

5

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test2+1-1
Sava Intensa UHP 2
Rating: Satisfactory
2-2-2
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
Rating: Satisfactory
3+2-2
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test58.124.8
Sava Intensa UHP 261.727.4
Kleber Dynaxer UHP64.528
Federal Evoluzion ST-16529
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test32,128,7
Sava Intensa UHP 234,735,5
Kleber Dynaxer UHP34,132,2
Federal Evoluzion ST-135,339,4
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test111
Sava Intensa UHP 2
Rating: Good
2-2+1-
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
Rating: Satisfactory
3+22
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,228,7
Sava Intensa UHP 235,732,8
Kleber Dynaxer UHP35,932,1
Federal Evoluzion ST-13733,4
Show test details