Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost3. Federal Evoluzion ST-1 Lowcost
```html
Comparing two popular summer tyres, Sava Intensa UHP 2 and Kleber Dynaxer UHP, can help us understand their strengths and weaknesses. As per tyre test data, noticeable differences can be identified between these two.
Sava Intensa UHP 2 comes from the prestigious Sava brand, a successor to the previous model, Sava Intensa UHP. The tyre has a 67% rating in our test. It scored the 17th position in Autobild test among total 53 tyres.
Strengths of the Sava Intensa UHP 2 include short dry braking distances, low rolling resistance, and an attractive price. However, it underperforms in wet and dry handling, indicating a tendency to understeer. Also, its aquaplaning reserve is modest, suggesting it may struggle in heavy rain.
On the other hand, Kleber Dynaxer UHP comes from the renowned Kleber brand, holds 15th position in the same Autobild test. Our tests rated it at 48%.
Its strengths include low exterior noise, providing a quiet and comfortable ride, and impressive high mileage performance. It also features low rolling resistance, contributing to better fuel efficiency. However, Kleber Dynaxer UHP falls short when it comes to grip and lateral support in wet conditions. Like Sava, it too has little tolerance for aquaplaning.
In conclusion, while Sava Intensa UHP 2 offers a strong price-value ratio and is perfect for dry conditions, Kleber Dynaxer UHP promises silent performance and impressive mileage. However, neither of the tyres excel when it comes to wet grip or aquaplaning resistance.
Therefore, if you prioritise value for money, dry condition performance or short dry braking distances, Sava Intensa UHP 2 should be your choice. But for those seeking high mileage performance and quiet ride, the Kleber Dynaxer UHP could be the better option.
```
Keep in mind that these conclusions are based on our test data. Each tyre’s performance may vary depending on the specific vehicle, driving conditions, or individual driving style. Always remember to match the right tyre for your specific usage needs.
1. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost3. Federal Evoluzion ST-1 Lowcost
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 13.33
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory
1. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 61.7 | 27.4 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 64.5 | 28 | |||||
| Federal Evoluzion ST-1 | 65 | 29 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 34,7 | 35,5 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 34,1 | 32,2 | |||||
| Federal Evoluzion ST-1 | 35,3 | 39,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Good | 2- | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35,7 | 32,8 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 35,9 | 32,1 | |||||
| Federal Evoluzion ST-1 | 37 | 33,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||