• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer UHP

Mutual tests overview

Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results

Tests used in comparison (2)

Organization Season Year Dimension Action
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2023 225/45 R18 View
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2019 225/45 R17 View

```html
Comparing two popular summer tyres, Sava Intensa UHP 2 and Kleber Dynaxer UHP, can help us understand their strengths and weaknesses. As per tyre test data, noticeable differences can be identified between these two.


Sava Intensa UHP 2 comes from the prestigious Sava brand, a successor to the previous model, Sava Intensa UHP. The tyre has a 67% rating in our test. It scored the 17th position in Autobild test among total 53 tyres.


Strengths of the Sava Intensa UHP 2 include short dry braking distances, low rolling resistance, and an attractive price. However, it underperforms in wet and dry handling, indicating a tendency to understeer. Also, its aquaplaning reserve is modest, suggesting it may struggle in heavy rain.


On the other hand, Kleber Dynaxer UHP comes from the renowned Kleber brand, holds 15th position in the same Autobild test. Our tests rated it at 48%.


Its strengths include low exterior noise, providing a quiet and comfortable ride, and impressive high mileage performance. It also features low rolling resistance, contributing to better fuel efficiency. However, Kleber Dynaxer UHP falls short when it comes to grip and lateral support in wet conditions. Like Sava, it too has little tolerance for aquaplaning.


In conclusion, while Sava Intensa UHP 2 offers a strong price-value ratio and is perfect for dry conditions, Kleber Dynaxer UHP promises silent performance and impressive mileage. However, neither of the tyres excel when it comes to wet grip or aquaplaning resistance.


Therefore, if you prioritise value for money, dry condition performance or short dry braking distances, Sava Intensa UHP 2 should be your choice. But for those seeking high mileage performance and quiet ride, the Kleber Dynaxer UHP could be the better option.
```
Keep in mind that these conclusions are based on our test data. Each tyre’s performance may vary depending on the specific vehicle, driving conditions, or individual driving style. Always remember to match the right tyre for your specific usage needs.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Sava Intensa UHP 2
74%
Sava
Intensa UHP 2
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
65%
Kleber
Dynaxer UHP
Wet Braking
Sava Intensa UHP 2
64%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
64%
Best: Pirelli P Zero PZ4 (91.0%)
Wet Handling
Sava Intensa UHP 2
73%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
66%
Wet Circle Cornering
Sava Intensa UHP 2
76%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
61%
Best: Nokian Wetproof (100.0%)
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Sava Intensa UHP 2
71%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
76%
Aquaplaning Cross
Sava Intensa UHP 2
85%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
58%
Best in category: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 (98.3%)
Dry Performance
Sava Intensa UHP 2
80%
Sava
Intensa UHP 2
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Kleber
Dynaxer UHP
Dry Braking
Sava Intensa UHP 2
82%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
64%
Dry Handling
Sava Intensa UHP 2
78%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
80%
Best: Pirelli P ZERO (100.0%)
Best in category: Pirelli P ZERO (100.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Sava Intensa UHP 2
74%
Sava
Intensa UHP 2
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
90%
Kleber
Dynaxer UHP
Noise Exterior
Sava Intensa UHP 2
74%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
90%
Best: Nokian Wetproof (97.0%)
Best in category: Nokian Wetproof (97.0%)
Economy
Sava Intensa UHP 2
72%
Sava
Intensa UHP 2
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
75%
Kleber
Dynaxer UHP
Rolling Resistance
Sava Intensa UHP 2
72%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
81%
Mileage
Sava Intensa UHP 2
72%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
69%
Best in category: Continental PremiumContact 6 (89.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison