Segment
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava summer tyres are slightly better rated (62%) than Debica (58%). In this particular case, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 has a better rating of 64% compared to 56% of the Debica Presto UHP 2. The first tyre test of Sava Intensa UHP 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2024 when was the Debica Presto UHP 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Intensa UHP 2 and the Presto UHP 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Sava Intensa UHP 2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (71%) of the Debica Presto UHP 2 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Sava Intensa UHP 2
| Debica Presto UHP 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R17 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 12.86
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35.9 | 34.4 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP 2 | 36.4 | 33.1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||