Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Sava (62%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 has a better rating of 77% compared to 64% of the Sava Intensa UHP 2. The first tyre test of Sava Intensa UHP 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2023 when was the Bridgestone Turanza 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the Intensa UHP 2 and the Turanza 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Sava Intensa UHP 2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (77%) of the Bridgestone Turanza 6 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Sava Intensa UHP 2
| Bridgestone Turanza 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 12.86
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 61.7 | 27.4 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 | 63.8 | 27.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||