Segment
1. Sava Intensa HP2 Lowcost2. Viking Protech NewGen Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Intensa HP2 vs. Viking Protech NewGen
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Viking (28%). In this particular case, the Sava Intensa HP2 has a better rating of 65% compared to 28% of the Viking Protech NewGen. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Intensa HP2 and the Protech NewGen were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Sava Intensa HP2
| Viking Protech NewGen
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Sava Intensa HP2 18.252. Viking Protech NewGen 32.17
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Sava Intensa HP2 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Viking Protech NewGen Satisfactory2. Sava Intensa HP2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Sava Intensa HP2 Rating: Good | 2,6 | 2,8 | |||||
| Viking Protech NewGen Rating: Good | 2,5 | 3,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Sava Intensa HP2 | 36,4 | 33,7 | |||||
| Viking ProTech NewGen | 38,1 | 36,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
