Segment
1. Sava Intensa HP Lowcost2. Fulda EcoControl HP Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Sava (62%). But when it comes to comparing Sava Intensa HP and Fulda EcoControl HP, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Intensa HP and the EcoControl HP were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 57% of Sava Intensa HP has C wet grip rating, whereas 71% of Fulda EcoControl HP has B rating.
| # | Sava Intensa HP
| Fulda EcoControl HP
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Sava Intensa HP Lowcost2. Fulda EcoControl HP Lowcost
2. Sava Intensa HP 13.5
1. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended2. Sava Intensa HP Satisfactory
1. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended2. Sava Intensa HP Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Sava Intensa HP | 37,7 | 40,5 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP | 37 | 39,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||