Segment
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa HP Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Sava (62%). The first tyre test of Sava Intensa HP was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Firestone Roadhawk first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Intensa HP and the Roadhawk were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 57% of Sava Intensa HP has C wet grip rating, whereas 93% of Firestone Roadhawk has A rating.
| # | Sava Intensa HP
| Firestone Roadhawk
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa HP Lowcost
2. Sava Intensa HP 13.5
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Sava Intensa HP Satisfactory
1. Sava Intensa HP Satisfactory2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Sava Intensa HP | 37,7 | 40,5 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,2 | 36,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||