Segment
1. Michelin Alpin A4 Premium2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Premium3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle4. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Eskimo S3+ vs. Michelin Alpin A4 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.214. Sava Eskimo S3+ 12.2
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Highly recommended2. Michelin Alpin A4 Highly recommended3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory4. Sava Eskimo S3+ Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Michelin Alpin A4 Recommended3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory4. Sava Eskimo S3+ Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 68 dB
Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,1 | 1,9 | 2,2 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Sava Eskimo S3+ Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2,8 | 3,6 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
| Michelin Alpin A4 Rating: Recommended | 2,1 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 2,7 |
| Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: Recommended | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,1 | 2,5 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo S3+ | 43,0 | 28,7 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin A4 | 39,7 | 27,9 | |||||
| Goodyear UltraGrip 9 | 36,9 | 28,6 | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 41,7 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
