Segment
1. Michelin Alpin A4 Premium2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Sava (58%). But when it comes to comparing Sava Eskimo S3+ and Michelin Alpin A4, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Eskimo S3+ and the Alpin A4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 83% of Sava Eskimo S3+ dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (95%) of the Michelin Alpin A4 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Sava Eskimo S3+
| Michelin Alpin A4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Alpin A4 Premium2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost
2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 12.2
1. Michelin Alpin A4 Highly recommended2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Satisfactory
1. Michelin Alpin A4 Recommended2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,1 | 1,9 | 2,2 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Sava Eskimo S3+ Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2,8 | 3,6 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
| Michelin Alpin A4 Rating: Recommended | 2,1 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 2,7 |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo S3+ | 43,0 | 28,7 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin A4 | 39,7 | 27,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||