Segment
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Eskimo S3+ vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Matador (40%). The first tyre test of Sava Eskimo S3+ was done in 2015, compared to 2022 when was the Matador MP93 Nordicca first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 83% of Sava Eskimo S3+ dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Matador MP93 Nordicca also have C wet ratings.
| # | Sava Eskimo S3+
| Matador MP93 Nordicca
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ 12.22. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Satisfactory2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow performance
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice lateral guidance
Ice braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Matador MP93 Nordicca -118%
