Comparison: Sava Eskimo S3+ vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77

#	Sava Eskimo S3+ /0%	Firestone Winterhawk 3 /0%	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R13 - R16	R13 - R18	R13 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Sava Eskimo S3+

/0%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

/0%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

/0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

New comparison

Dimensions

R13 - R16

R13 - R18

R13 - R19

Price

Set dimension to see prices

Remove

Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

3. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 66

3. Sava Eskimo S3+ 39

Number of tests

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 14x

3. Sava Eskimo S3+ 5x

Best position in test

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 3.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

3. Sava Eskimo S3+ 3.

Worst position in test

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 21.

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 32.

Average position in tests

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 12.2

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 16

Year of the last test

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 2020

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

3. Sava Eskimo S3+ 2019

Best rating in test

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

3. Sava Eskimo S3+ Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Conditionally recommended

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

77.2%

Sava
Eskimo S3+

68%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

63%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Sava Eskimo S3+ C

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 C

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Sava
Eskimo S3+

84%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

81.3%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

79%

Snow performance

1. Sava Eskimo S3+ 85%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 73%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 0%

Snow traction

1. Sava Eskimo S3+ 84%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 78%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 0%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

84%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74.4%

Sava
Eskimo S3+

53%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

73.1%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

66%

Sava
Eskimo S3+

62%

Exterior noise

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 65%

2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 59%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 0%

Interior noise

1. Sava Eskimo S3+ 66%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 67%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Sava Eskimo S3+ ?

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 ?

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Sava
Eskimo S3+

84%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

79%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75.2%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Sava Eskimo S3+ 81%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 78%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 0%

Ice braking

1. Sava Eskimo S3+ 86%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 81%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 0%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

81%

Sava
Eskimo S3+

77%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

76.7%

Mileage

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 72%

2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 72%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 0%

Fuel efficiency

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 89%

2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 81%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 E

2. Sava Eskimo S3+ E

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Add to comparison

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2018 175/65 R14

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,7	2,0	1,8	2,4	3,2	1,5	1,6
Sava Eskimo S3+ Rating: Satisfactory	2,9	2,9	2,2	2,5	3,5	2,0	2,1
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Satisfactory	2,6	2,0	2,3	2,5	3,3	2,0	1,8
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2017 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,7	1,7	2,1	3,0	1,5	1,7
Sava Eskimo S3+ Rating: Satisfactory	2,9	3,3	1,9	2,4	3,5	2,5	2,2
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3,1	2,1	2,9	2,5	3,4	2,5	1,8
Show test details