Segment
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Eskimo S3+ vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Firestone (56%). But when it comes to comparing Sava Eskimo S3+ and Firestone Winterhawk 3, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 test, where both the Eskimo S3+ and the Winterhawk 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 83% of Sava Eskimo S3+ dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (92%) of the Firestone Winterhawk 3 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Sava Eskimo S3+
| Firestone Winterhawk 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ 12.2
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Conditionally recommended2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow performance
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry performance
Dry driving behavior
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel efficiency
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Ice lateral guidance
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Sava Eskimo S3+ Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,9 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 2,0 | 2,1 |
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,0 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 3,3 | 2,0 | 1,8 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,7 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
| Sava Eskimo S3+ Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 3,3 | 1,9 | 2,4 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,1 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 1,8 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo S3+ | 43,0 | 28,7 | |||||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 41,9 | 28,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
