18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Michelin ALPIN 6 vs. Barum Polaris 5

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Sava Eskimo HP2 /58%	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%	Michelin ALPIN 6 /63%	Barum Polaris 5 /63%

Dimensions	R15 - R18	R13 - R19	R15 - R20	R13 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost

4. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 76

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

3. Barum Polaris 5 76

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 25

Number of tests

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 31x

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 15x

4. Barum Polaris 5 13x

Best position in test

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 1.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 6.

4. Barum Polaris 5 9.

Worst position in test

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 13.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 23.

4. Barum Polaris 5 26.

Average position in tests

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 4.35

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

3. Barum Polaris 5 15.15

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.47

Year of the last test

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 2025

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 2024

3. Barum Polaris 5 2023

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

Best rating in test

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Exemplary

2. Barum Polaris 5 Good

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Good

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

4. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient

Snow

(Overall rating)

Michelin
ALPIN 6

81%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

79%

Barum
Polaris 5

75%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

71%

Snow traction

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 90%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 82%

3. Barum Polaris 5 71%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 68%

Snow braking

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 89%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 87%

3. Barum Polaris 5 81%

4. Michelin ALPIN 6 82%

Snow handling

1. Barum Polaris 5 81%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 77%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 72%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 62%

Snow cornering

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 74%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 74%

3. Barum Polaris 5 67%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 66%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Michelin
ALPIN 6

82%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

79%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

68%

Barum
Polaris 5

63%

Dry braking

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 83%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 63%

4. Barum Polaris 5 55%

Dry handling

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 82%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 82%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 72%

4. Barum Polaris 5 71%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Michelin
ALPIN 6

80%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

76%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

62%

Barum
Polaris 5

61%

Wet braking

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 78%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 68%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 61%

4. Barum Polaris 5 55%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 82%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 82%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 73%

4. Barum Polaris 5 56%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 78%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 57%

4. Barum Polaris 5 46%

Wet handling

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 85%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

3. Barum Polaris 5 73%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 60%

Wet circle cornering

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 77%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

3. Barum Polaris 5 73%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 59%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 B

2. Barum Polaris 5 C

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 5

87%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

83%

Michelin
ALPIN 6

80%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

76%

Mileage

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 98%

2. Barum Polaris 5 79%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 74%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 74%

Price/value

1. Barum Polaris 5 92%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 92%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 74%

4. Michelin ALPIN 6 70%

Rolling resistance

1. Barum Polaris 5 91%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 83%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

4. Michelin ALPIN 6 73%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 C

3. Barum Polaris 5 E

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Michelin
ALPIN 6

87%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

76%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74%

Barum
Polaris 5

65%

Exterior noise

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 81%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 72%

3. Barum Polaris 5 69%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 69%

Comfort

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 93%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 83%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

4. Barum Polaris 5 61%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 ?

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 ?

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

4. Barum Polaris 5 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Sava
Eskimo HP2

85.2%

Michelin
ALPIN 6

85.7%

Barum
Polaris 5

82%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75.2%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 8 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3	2-	2	2	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	3+	2	2+
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2+	2-	1
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3+	2+	1-	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Sava Eskimo HP2	36,5	28
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36,1	28,6
Michelin Alpin 6	34,9	29,1
Barum Polaris 5	36,1	28,8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	30,3	24,3
Sava Eskimo HP2	36,3	25,1
Uniroyal MS plus 77	34,2	25
Barum Polaris 5	35,2	24,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3	1-	2
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Good	2	2-	2+	2-
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Sava Eskimo HP2	33,6	24,1
Uniroyal MS plus 77	32,8	24,6
Michelin Alpin 6	30,4	24,7
Barum Polaris 5	33,9	25
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2	1-
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Sava Eskimo HP2	36,4	27,2
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36	28,1
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2017 215/65 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,1	2,0	1,9	2,3	3,1	0,5	1,4
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	2,7	2,4	2,5	2,3	3,6	1,5	1,7
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2,4	3,2	2,1	2,8	3,2	2,0	2,5
Show test details

Comparison: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Michelin ALPIN 6 vs. Barum Polaris 5

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands