12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Sava Eskimo HP2 /58%	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%	Barum Polaris 5 /63%	GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ /90%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%

Dimensions	R15 - R18	R13 - R19	R13 - R19	R15 - R22	R14 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost

5. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 176

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

4. Barum Polaris 5 76

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 25

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 23x

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 15x

5. Barum Polaris 5 13x

Best position in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 6.

5. Barum Polaris 5 9.

Worst position in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 8.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 23.

5. Barum Polaris 5 26.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 3.26

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

4. Barum Polaris 5 15.15

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.47

Year of the last test

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 2025

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

3. Barum Polaris 5 2023

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 2023

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

Best rating in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

3. Barum Polaris 5 Good

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

5. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient

Snow

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

86%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

79%

Barum
Polaris 5

75%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

71%

Snow braking

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 97%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 89%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 87%

5. Barum Polaris 5 81%

Snow traction

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 97%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 82%

4. Barum Polaris 5 71%

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 68%

Snow handling

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

3. Barum Polaris 5 81%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 72%

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 62%

Snow cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 81%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 74%

4. Barum Polaris 5 67%

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 66%

Dry

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

86%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

83%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

79%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

68%

Barum
Polaris 5

63%

Dry braking

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 87%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 75%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 63%

5. Barum Polaris 5 55%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 92%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 84%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 82%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 72%

5. Barum Polaris 5 71%

Wet

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

94%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

91%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

76%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

62%

Barum
Polaris 5

61%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 97%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 92%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 68%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 61%

5. Barum Polaris 5 55%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 97%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 82%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 73%

5. Barum Polaris 5 56%

Wet handling

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 95%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 92%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

4. Barum Polaris 5 73%

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 60%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 57%

5. Barum Polaris 5 46%

Wet circle cornering

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 95%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 92%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

4. Barum Polaris 5 73%

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 59%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ B

3. Barum Polaris 5 C

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 5

87%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

83%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

76%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

71%

Mileage

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 84%

2. Barum Polaris 5 79%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 74%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 74%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 67%

Price/value

1. Barum Polaris 5 92%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 92%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 74%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 68%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

Rolling resistance

1. Barum Polaris 5 91%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 83%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 81%

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ C

4. Barum Polaris 5 E

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

92%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

76%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74%

Barum
Polaris 5

65%

Exterior noise

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 72%

4. Barum Polaris 5 69%

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 69%

Comfort

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 95%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 83%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 75%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

5. Barum Polaris 5 61%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 72 dB

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 ?

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

5. Barum Polaris 5 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Sava
Eskimo HP2

85.2%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

84.3%

Barum
Polaris 5

82%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80.7%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75.2%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 8 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3	2-	2	2	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	3+	2	2+
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3+	2+	1-	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2	1	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Sava Eskimo HP2	36,5	28
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36,1	28,6
Barum Polaris 5	36,1	28,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,1	28,1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	30,3	24,3
Sava Eskimo HP2	36,3	25,1
Uniroyal MS plus 77	34,2	25
Barum Polaris 5	35,2	24,9
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+	34,4	24,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	30,3	24,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3	1-	2
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Good	2	2-	2+	2-
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	1-	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Sava Eskimo HP2	33,6	24,1
Uniroyal MS plus 77	32,8	24,6
Barum Polaris 5	33,9	25
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+	30,6	24,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	29,2	24,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2	1-
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Sava Eskimo HP2	36,4	27,2
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36	28,1
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2017 215/65 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,1	2,0	1,9	2,3	3,1	0,5	1,4
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	2,7	2,4	2,5	2,3	3,6	1,5	1,7
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2,4	3,2	2,1	2,8	3,2	2,0	2,5
Show test details

Comparison: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands