Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost4. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.474. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory4. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory4. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 37,6 | 26,1 | |||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P | 36 | 26,2 | |||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 37,8 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 1,5 | |
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 3,0 | 2,2 | 2,4 | 4,0 | 2,5 | |
| Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,1 | 2,8 | 2,5 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
