12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Michelin ALPIN 6 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Sava Eskimo HP2 /58%	Michelin ALPIN 6 /63%	Nokian WR Snowproof P /67%	Hankook Ventus Prime 4 /72%

Dimensions	R15 - R18	R15 - R20	R17 - R21	R13 - R23
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 530

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 76

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P 55

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 25

Number of tests

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 31x

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 15x

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 12x

4. Nokian WR Snowproof P 7x

Best position in test

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 1.

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2.

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P 4.

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 6.

Worst position in test

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 9.

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 13.

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P 18.

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 23.

Average position in tests

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 4.35

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 5.75

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P 9.71

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.47

Year of the last test

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2025

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P 2025

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 2025

4. Michelin ALPIN 6 2024

Best rating in test

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 Exemplary

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

4. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Good

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

4. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory

Snow

(Overall rating)

Michelin
ALPIN 6

80%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

78%

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

77.2%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

?

Snow traction

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 88%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 85%

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P 0%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Snow braking

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 88%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 78%

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P 0%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Snow handling

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 77%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 68%

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P 0%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

90.3%

Michelin
ALPIN 6

81%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

81.2%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

65%

Dry braking

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 80%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 66%

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P 0%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Michelin
ALPIN 6

79%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

73.7%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

64%

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

64.1%

Wet braking

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 79%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 63%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

4. Nokian WR Snowproof P 0%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 76%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 73%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

4. Nokian WR Snowproof P 0%

Wet handling

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 82%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 60%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

4. Nokian WR Snowproof P 0%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 82%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 63%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

4. Nokian WR Snowproof P 0%

Wet circle cornering

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 75%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 59%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

4. Nokian WR Snowproof P 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 A

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 B

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P B

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

Costs

(Overall rating)

Sava
Eskimo HP2

85%

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

84.7%

Michelin
ALPIN 6

80%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

77.5%

Mileage

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 95%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 75%

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P 0%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 C

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P C

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 C

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

91.7%

Michelin
ALPIN 6

82%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

76.9%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

75%

Exterior noise

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 78%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 64%

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P 0%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 ?

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 ?

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Michelin
ALPIN 6

86%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

84%

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

0%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 10 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
Sava Eskimo HP2	39.5	29.6
Michelin Alpin 6	36.2	29.7
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R17

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	1,8	2,0
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	2,2	3,4
Michelin ALPIN 6 Rating: Good	1,8	2,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Sava Eskimo HP2	37,6	26,1
Michelin Alpin 6	34,1	26,4
Nokian WR Snowproof P	36	26,2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2022 215/60 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Rolling resistance	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	2,0	1,8	1,4	1,8	1,5	2,7	1,5
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3,0	2,5	2,3	2,0	1,7	3,5	1,5
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Good	2,4	2,0	2,4	1,9	2,6	2,8	2,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3	2-	2	2	2+
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2+	2-	1
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2021 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,6	1,9	1,5	2,1	2,7	1,5
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3,1	3,0	2,2	2,4	4,0	2,5
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Good	2,3	2,1	2,4	2,2	3,1	1,5
Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Satisfactory	3,3	2,2	2,7	2,1	2,8	2,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Sava Eskimo HP2	36,5	28
Michelin Alpin 6	34,9	29,1
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,3	2,0	1,8	2,1	2,5	1,0	1,8
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3,1	3,1	2,5	2,3	3,0	2,0	1,9
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Good	2,0	2,5	2,1	2,2	2,6	1,5	2,1
Show test details