Comparison: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Matador (47%). In this particular case, the Sava Eskimo HP2 has a better rating of 61% compared to 47% of the Matador MP93 Nordicca. The first tyre test of Sava Eskimo HP2 was done in 2017, compared to 2022 when was the Matador MP93 Nordicca first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Eskimo HP2 and the MP93 Nordicca were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 59% of Sava Eskimo HP2 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Matador MP93 Nordicca also have C wet ratings.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAC
|
Winter
|
2022 | 215/60 R16 | View |
Performance comparison
Sava Eskimo HP2
Matador MP93 Nordicca
Sava Eskimo HP2
Matador MP93 Nordicca
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
