12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Sava Eskimo HP2 /58%	Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 /0%	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%

Dimensions	R15 - R18	R13 - R17	R13 - R19	R15 - R18
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Premium

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 25

Number of tests

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 21x

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 15x

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

Best position in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 6.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 20.

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 23.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 7.1

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.47

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 2025

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2020

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

Best rating in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory

Snow

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

82%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

78.3%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

77%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

71%

Snow traction

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 81%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 68%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Snow braking

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 86%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 87%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 87%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Snow handling

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 97%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 68%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 62%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Snow cornering

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 74%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 66%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 56%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

79%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

77%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

75.4%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

65%

Dry braking

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 80%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 63%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Dry handling

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 82%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 74%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 72%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

83%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

76%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

72.1%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

62%

Wet braking

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 85%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 68%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 61%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 82%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 78%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 73%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Wet handling

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 81%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 60%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 57%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Wet circle cornering

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 86%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 59%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 C

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Sava
Eskimo HP2

85%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

78.1%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

76%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

70%

Mileage

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 75%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 74%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 71%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Price/value

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 92%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 76%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 74%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Rolling resistance

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 83%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 64%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 E

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

80%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

75%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

68.2%

Exterior noise

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 80%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 72%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 64%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Comfort

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 83%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 80%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 ?

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 ?

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Sava
Eskimo HP2

84%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

79%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

79.3%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75.2%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3	2-	2	2	2+
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Good*	1-	2	1-	2	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	3+	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Sava Eskimo HP2	36,5	28
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	33,4	28,2
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36,1	28,6
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	37,4	28,6
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,3	2,0	1,8	2,1	2,5	1,0	1,8
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3,1	3,1	2,5	2,3	3,0	2,0	1,9
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Good*	2,0	2,5	2,1	2,4	3,2	2,0	1,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3	1-	2
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Good*	2-	2-	1	2
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Good	2	2-	2+	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Sava Eskimo HP2	33,6	24,1
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	32	24,9
Uniroyal MS plus 77	32,8	24,6
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	34,8	-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Sava Eskimo HP2	36,4	27,2
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	35,9	28,6
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36	28,1
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	38,4	-
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2017 215/65 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,1	2,0	1,9	2,3	3,1	0,5	1,4
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	2,7	2,4	2,5	2,3	3,6	1,5	1,7
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Satisfactory*	3,3	2,0	2,1	2,5	3,6	1,5	2,1
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2,4	3,2	2,1	2,8	3,2	2,0	2,5
Show test details

Comparison: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands