Segment
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (94%) than Sava (58%). In this particular case, the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has a better rating of 90% compared to 58% of the Sava Eskimo HP2. The first tyre test of Sava Eskimo HP2 was done in 2017, compared to 2019 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 225/45 R17 test, where both the Eskimo HP2 and the UltraGrip Performance+ were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 59% of Sava Eskimo HP2 has C wet grip rating, whereas 83% of GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has B rating.
| # | Sava Eskimo HP2
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.47
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,0 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 3,4 | |||||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good | 2,1 | 2,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 37,6 | 26,1 | |||||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | 35,5 | 25,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,8 | 1,4 | 1,8 | 1,5 | 2,7 | 1,5 |
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 1,7 | 3,5 | 1,5 |
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good | 2,5 | 2,5 | 1,4 | 2,2 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 2,5 |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 1,5 | |
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 3,0 | 2,2 | 2,4 | 4,0 | 2,5 | |
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,0 | 2,5 | |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,3 | 25,1 | |||||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | 34,4 | 24,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 1- | 2 | |||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | 1- | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 33,6 | 24,1 | |||||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | 30,6 | 24,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||