Comparison: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Debica Frigo HP2
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Debica (50%). In this particular case, the Sava Eskimo HP2 has a better rating of 58% compared to 50% of the Debica Frigo HP2. The first tyre test of Sava Eskimo HP2 was done in 2017, compared to 2018 when was the Debica Frigo HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Eskimo HP2 and the Frigo HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 59% of Sava Eskimo HP2 has C wet grip rating, whereas 50% of Debica Frigo HP2 has B rating.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autobild
|
Winter
|
2019 | 225/45 R17 | View |
Performance comparison
Sava Eskimo HP2
Debica Frigo HP2
Sava Eskimo HP2
Debica Frigo HP2
Sava Eskimo HP2
Debica Frigo HP2
Sava Eskimo HP2
Debica Frigo HP2
Sava Eskimo HP2
Debica Frigo HP2
Sava Eskimo HP2
Debica Frigo HP2
Sava Eskimo HP2
Debica Frigo HP2
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
