• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Sava (58%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 82% compared to 58% of the Sava Eskimo HP2. The first tyre test of Sava Eskimo HP2 was done in 2017, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 225/45 R17 test, where both the Eskimo HP2 and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 59% of Sava Eskimo HP2 has C wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A rating.

Mutual tests overview

Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results

Tests used in comparison (5)

Organization Season Year Dimension Action
ADAC ADAC
Winter
2022 215/60 R16 View
Autobild Autobild
Winter
2021 205/55 R16 View
ADAC ADAC
Winter
2021 225/50 R17 View
ADAC ADAC
Winter
2020 205/55 R16 View
Autobild Autobild
Winter
2019 225/45 R17 View

Performance comparison

Averaged from 5 tests

Wet Performance
Sava Eskimo HP2
62%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Wet Braking
Sava Eskimo HP2
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Wet Handling
Sava Eskimo HP2
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
Wet Circle Cornering
Sava Eskimo HP2
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Sava Eskimo HP2
57%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Aquaplaning Cross
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Dry Performance
Sava Eskimo HP2
70%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Dry Braking
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Best: Nokian Snowproof P (91.0%)
Dry Handling
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
92%
Best in category: Nokian Snowproof P (91.0%)
Snow Performance
Sava Eskimo HP2
77%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Snow Braking
Sava Eskimo HP2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Best: Debica Frigo HP2 (97.0%)
Snow Traction
Sava Eskimo HP2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Best: Debica Frigo HP2 (97.0%)
Snow Handling
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
68%
Snow Circle Cornering
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Best in category: Debica Frigo HP2 (93.3%)
Ice Performance
Sava Eskimo HP2
86%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Ice Braking Abs
Sava Eskimo HP2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Ice Lateral Guidance
Sava Eskimo HP2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Best: Nokian Snowproof P (91.0%)
Best in category: Continental WinterContact TS 870 (91.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Sava Eskimo HP2
77%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
75%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Noise Exterior
Sava Eskimo HP2
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Noise Interior
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
71%
Ride Comfort
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
75%
Best in category: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ (92.0%)
Economy
Sava Eskimo HP2
82%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Rolling Resistance
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Best: Nokian WR Snowproof (94.0%)
Fuel Efficiency
Sava Eskimo HP2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Mileage
Sava Eskimo HP2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
67%
Best in category: King Meiler Winter Tact WT81 (92.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison