Segment
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Premium2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.47
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Exemplary2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 8 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
8
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.1 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 37.9 | 28.1 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 36.0 | 27.3 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 | 33.2 | 27.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 39.5 | 29.6 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 37.5 | 29.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 37,6 | 26,1 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | 1 | ||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2+ | ||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 3+ | 1- | 3+ | 2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,5 | 28 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,6 | 27,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 1- | 2 | |||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2- | 1- | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2 | 1- | |||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 1 | 2 | |||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,4 | 27,2 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,1 | 25,9 | |||||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 36,3 | 27,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
