Comparison: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Sava (58%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 81% compared to 58% of the Sava Eskimo HP2. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Eskimo HP2 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 59% of Sava Eskimo HP2 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has B rating.

#	Sava Eskimo HP2 /58%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R15 - R18	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Sava Eskimo HP2

/58%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

/81%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

New comparison

Dimensions

R15 - R18

R14 - R19

Price

Set dimension to see prices

Remove

Remove from comparison

Segment

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 25

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 15x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 6.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 23.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.47

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 2025

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

89%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

79%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 82%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 94%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 89%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 72%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 74%

Dry

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

68%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

68%

Dry braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 63%

Dry handling

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 72%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

Wet

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

62%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 73%

Wet braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 61%

Wet handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 60%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 57%

Wet circle cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 59%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

Costs

(Overall rating)

Sava
Eskimo HP2

83%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Mileage

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 75%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 74%

Price/value

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 92%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

Rolling resistance

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

76%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 87%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 69%

Comfort

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Sava
Eskimo HP2

85.2%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 8 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Snow
Best values in test	32.6	27.1
Sava Eskimo HP2	37.9	28.1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	36.0	27.3
Show test details

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
Sava Eskimo HP2	39.5	29.6
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	37.5	29.4
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Sava Eskimo HP2	37,6	26,1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3	2-	2	2	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	1-	3+	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Sava Eskimo HP2	36,5	28
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,6	27,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3	1-	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Sava Eskimo HP2	36,4	27,2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,1	25,9
Show test details

Comparison: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands