In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Sava (58%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 81% compared to 58% of the Sava Eskimo HP2. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Eskimo HP2 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 59% of Sava Eskimo HP2 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has B rating.
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Averaged from 2 tests
Sava Eskimo HP2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava Eskimo HP2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava Eskimo HP2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava Eskimo HP2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava Eskimo HP2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava Eskimo HP2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava Eskimo HP2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava Eskimo HP2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava Eskimo HP2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava Eskimo HP2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava Eskimo HP2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava Eskimo HP2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava Eskimo HP2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.