Segment
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost4. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Barum Polaris 5 15.154. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.47
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good3. Barum Polaris 5 Good4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended4. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 6 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
6
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 39.5 | 29.6 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37.7 | 30.0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 37,6 | 26,1 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37,5 | 26,9 | |||||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | 35,5 | 25,5 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 32,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | 1 | ||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2+ | ||
| Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3+ | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,5 | 28 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 36,1 | 28,8 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 32,1 | 28,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,3 | 25,1 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 35,2 | 24,9 | |||||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | 34,4 | 24,8 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 30,3 | 24,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 33,6 | 24,1 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 33,9 | 25 | |||||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | 30,6 | 24,3 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 29,2 | 24,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
