Segment
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Premium3. Pirelli Cinturato Winter Premium4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium5. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle6. Sava eskimo hp Lowcost
Comparison: Sava eskimo hp vs. Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 vs. Pirelli Cinturato Winter vs. Nokian WR D4 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
2. Michelin Alpin 5 5.883. Nokian WR D4 6.046. Sava eskimo hp 16.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Highly recommended2. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended3. Pirelli Cinturato Winter Highly recommended4. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good
Worst rating in test
3. Nokian WR D4 Recommended4. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended5. Pirelli Cinturato Winter Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Sava eskimo hp Rating: - | 3 | 2- | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: - | 2+ | 2 | 1- | 2 | |||
| Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: - | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter Rating: - | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: - | 2 | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Sava eskimo hp | 39,7 | 26,1 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 35,6 | 25,8 | |||||
| Goodyear UltraGrip 9 | 36,1 | 25 | |||||
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter | 36,2 | 26,4 | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 26,0 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 38,5 | 25,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
