Segment
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle2. Sava eskimo hp Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Firestone (56%). But when it comes to comparing Sava eskimo hp and Firestone Winterhawk 3, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Sava eskimo hp was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Firestone Winterhawk 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the eskimo hp and the Winterhawk 3 were tested.
| # | Sava eskimo hp
| Firestone Winterhawk 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle2. Sava eskimo hp Lowcost
2. Sava eskimo hp 16.5
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Sava eskimo hp | 39,7 | 26,1 | |||||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 39,8 | 27,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||