Segment
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Premium3. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle4. Sava eskimo hp Lowcost
Comparison: Sava eskimo hp vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Nokian WR D4 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR D4 6.044. Sava eskimo hp 16.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Exemplary2. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Recommended3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Sava eskimo hp Rating: - | 3 | 2- | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: - | 2+ | 2- | 1- | 2 | |||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: - | 2 | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: - | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Sava eskimo hp | 39,7 | 26,1 | |||||
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 | 36,1 | 25,5 | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 26,0 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 39,1 | 26,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
