Segment
2. Pirelli Cinturato Winter Premium4. Sava eskimo hp Lowcost
Comparison: Sava eskimo hp vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Pirelli Cinturato Winter vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
4. Sava eskimo hp 16.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Pirelli Cinturato Winter Highly recommended2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good
Worst rating in test
2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory3. Pirelli Cinturato Winter Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Sava eskimo hp Rating: - | 3 | 2- | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: - | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter Rating: - | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: - | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Sava eskimo hp | 39,7 | 26,1 | |||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 34,2 | 25,6 | |||||
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter | 36,2 | 26,4 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 39,1 | 26,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
