Segment
2. Pirelli Cinturato Winter Premium3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium4. Sava eskimo hp Lowcost
Comparison: Sava eskimo hp vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Pirelli Cinturato Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
4. Sava eskimo hp 16.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Pirelli Cinturato Winter Highly recommended2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good
Worst rating in test
3. Pirelli Cinturato Winter Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Sava eskimo hp Rating: - | 3 | 2- | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: - | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter Rating: - | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Sava eskimo hp | 39,7 | 26,1 | |||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 34,2 | 25,6 | |||||
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter | 36,2 | 26,4 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 38,5 | 25,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
