Segment
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium3. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle4. Sava eskimo hp Lowcost
Comparison: Sava eskimo hp vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Nokian WR D4 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR D4 6.044. Sava eskimo hp 16.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good
Worst rating in test
3. Nokian WR D4 Recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Sava eskimo hp Rating: - | 3 | 2- | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: - | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: - | 2 | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Sava eskimo hp | 39,7 | 26,1 | |||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 34,2 | 25,6 | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 26,0 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 38,5 | 25,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
