Segment
2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Premium3. Pirelli Cinturato Winter Premium4. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle5. Sava eskimo hp Lowcost
Comparison: Sava eskimo hp vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 vs. Pirelli Cinturato Winter vs. Nokian WR D4
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
3. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
3. Nokian WR D4 6.045. Sava eskimo hp 16.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Highly recommended2. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended3. Pirelli Cinturato Winter Highly recommended4. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good
Worst rating in test
3. Nokian WR D4 Recommended4. Pirelli Cinturato Winter Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Sava eskimo hp Rating: - | 3 | 2- | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: - | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: - | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter Rating: - | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: - | 2 | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Sava eskimo hp | 39,7 | 26,1 | |||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 34,2 | 25,6 | |||||
| Goodyear UltraGrip 9 | 36,1 | 25 | |||||
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter | 36,2 | 26,4 | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 26,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
