Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Sava eskimo hp Lowcost
Comparison: Sava eskimo hp vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Sava (58%). But when it comes to comparing Sava eskimo hp and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Sava eskimo hp was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the eskimo hp and the Blizzak LM-001 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Sava eskimo hp
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Sava eskimo hp 16.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Sava eskimo hp Rating: - | 3 | 2- | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Sava eskimo hp | 39,7 | 26,1 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 38,5 | 25,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
