Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium3. Vredestein Quatrac Premium4. Toyo Celsius AS2 Upper-middle5. Sava All Weather Lowcost
Comparison: Sava All Weather vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Vredestein Quatrac vs. Toyo Celsius AS2
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
4. Toyo Celsius AS2 11.645. Sava All Weather 17.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary2. Vredestein Quatrac Exemplary3. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Test winner4. Sava All Weather Satisfactory5. Toyo Celsius AS2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. Vredestein Quatrac Recommended4. Sava All Weather Satisfactory5. Toyo Celsius AS2 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 5.4 | 1.8 | 2.3 | ||||
| Sava All Weather Rating: Satisfactory | 3.7 | 2.3 | 3.7 | ||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | 2.7 | 2.2 | 2.9 | ||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Good | 2.7 | 2.2 | 2.9 | ||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Good | 2.8 | 2.2 | 3.1 | ||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3.8 | 2.3 | 3.8 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Sava All Weather | 43.1 | 53.8 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 41.3 | 49.5 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 37.7 | 47 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 40.3 | 45.4 | |||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 | 40.9 | 50.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
