Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Premium2. Sava Adapto HP Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Adapto HP vs. Vredestein Quatrac 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Vredestein allround tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Sava (32%). But when it comes to comparing Sava Adapto HP and Vredestein Quatrac 5, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Adapto HP and the Quatrac 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Sava Adapto HP
| Vredestein Quatrac 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Satisfactory2. Sava Adapto HP Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Adapto HP Satisfactory2. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 203 | 14 | 37 | 39 | 28 | ||
| Sava Adapto HP | 164 | 51 | 41 | 40 | 32 | ||
| Vredestein Quatrac 5 | 160 | 44 | 41 | 44 | 31 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 2+ | ||||
| Sava Adapto HP Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Vredestein Quatrac 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
