Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate+ (!) Premium2. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Premium3. Nokian WeatherProof Upper-middle4. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle5. Sava Adapto HP Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Adapto HP vs. Nokian WeatherProof vs. Michelin CrossClimate+ (!) vs. Vredestein Quatrac 5 vs. Kumho Solus HA31
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
5. Kumho Solus HA31 8.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WeatherProof Good +2. Michelin CrossClimate+ (!) Satisfactory3. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Satisfactory4. Sava Adapto HP Satisfactory5. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin CrossClimate+ (!) Satisfactory2. Sava Adapto HP Satisfactory3. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory4. Nokian WeatherProof Sufficient5. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 203 | 14 | 37 | 39 | 28 | ||
| Sava Adapto HP | 164 | 51 | 41 | 40 | 32 | ||
| Nokian WeatherProof | 203 | 67 | 62 | 42 | 32 | ||
| Vredestein Quatrac 5 | 160 | 44 | 41 | 44 | 31 | ||
| Kumho Solus HA31 | 160 | 50 | 37 | 42 | 31 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 2+ | ||||
| Sava Adapto HP Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Nokian WeatherProof Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 2+ | ||||
| Vredestein Quatrac 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
