Segment
1. Nokian WeatherProof Upper-middle2. Sava Adapto HP Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Nokian allround tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Sava (32%). But when it comes to comparing Sava Adapto HP and Nokian WeatherProof, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Adapto HP and the WeatherProof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 50% of Sava Adapto HP has C wet grip rating, whereas 67% of Nokian WeatherProof has B rating.
| # | Sava Adapto HP
| Nokian WeatherProof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WeatherProof Upper-middle2. Sava Adapto HP Lowcost
1. Nokian WeatherProof Good +2. Sava Adapto HP Satisfactory
1. Sava Adapto HP Satisfactory2. Nokian WeatherProof Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 203 | 14 | 37 | 39 | 28 | ||
| Sava Adapto HP | 164 | 51 | 41 | 40 | 32 | ||
| Nokian WeatherProof | 203 | 67 | 62 | 42 | 32 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 2+ | ||||
| Sava Adapto HP Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Nokian WeatherProof Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||