Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle2. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 Lowcost
Comparison: Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Sailun) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Sailun summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Kumho (56%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 has a better rating of 76% compared to 52% of the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2. The first tyre test of Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 was done in 2025, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Atrezzo ZSR2 and the Ecsta PS71 were tested.
| # | Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended2. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 Satisfactory2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Price/value
Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
