Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Premium2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium3. Pirelli P ZERO Premium4. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle5. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR Lowcost
Comparison: Sailun Atrezzo ZSR vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs. Pirelli P ZERO vs. Nokian WetProof
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WetProof 5.643. Pirelli P ZERO 6.06
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Exemplary2. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Highly recommended4. Pirelli P ZERO Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Pirelli P ZERO Good3. Nokian WetProof Recommended4. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Sailun Atrezzo ZSR | 37,9 | 38,2 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 | 34,2 | 29,6 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | 35,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Pirelli P ZERO | 35,1 | 28,9 | |||||
| Nokian WetProof | 35,2 | 29,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
