Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Sailun) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Sailun (57%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 has a better rating of 77% compared to 61% of the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2. The first tyre test of Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 was done in 2024, compared to 2023 when was the Bridgestone Turanza 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2024 215/55 R17 test, where both the Atrezzo ZSR 2 and the Turanza 6 were tested.
| # | Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2
| Bridgestone Turanza 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R17 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 Lowcost
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary2. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 Satisfactory
2. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,7 | |||||
| Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 3,1 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 2,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||