Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle3. Saetta Touring 2 Lowcost4. Nexen N fera Sport Lowcost
Comparison: Saetta Touring 2 vs. Nokian Powerproof vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Nexen N fera Sport
Table of contents:
| # | Saetta Touring 2
| Nokian Powerproof
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Nexen N fera Sport
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R16 | R17 - R20 | R16 - R22 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Nexen N fera Sport Exemplary3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nexen N fera Sport Satisfactory2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended3. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Saetta Touring 2 | 36,8 | 34,9 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34,9 | 29 | |||||
| Nexen N fera Sport | 33,2 | 30,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
