Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium4. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle5. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle6. Saetta Touring 2 Lowcost7. Nexen N fera Sport Lowcost
Comparison: Saetta Touring 2 vs. Nokian Powerproof vs. Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs. Nexen N fera Sport
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
4. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Exemplary3. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary4. Nexen N fera Sport Exemplary5. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended6. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended3. Nexen N fera Sport Satisfactory4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended5. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended6. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Saetta Touring 2 | 36,8 | 34,9 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 | 33,5 | 28,7 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 33,2 | 30,2 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34,9 | 29 | |||||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | 33,2 | 30,8 | |||||
| Nexen N fera Sport | 33,2 | 30,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
