Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle3. Saetta Touring 2 Lowcost4. Nexen N fera Sport Lowcost
Comparison: Saetta Touring 2 vs. Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Nexen N fera Sport
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nexen N fera Sport Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended3. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nexen N fera Sport Satisfactory2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended3. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Saetta Touring 2 | 36,8 | 34,9 | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 | 33,5 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34,9 | 29 | |||||
| Nexen N fera Sport | 33,2 | 30,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
