Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium3. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle5. Saetta Touring 2 Lowcost6. Nexen N fera Sport Lowcost
Comparison: Saetta Touring 2 vs. Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Nexen N fera Sport vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary3. Nexen N fera Sport Exemplary4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended5. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended3. Nexen N fera Sport Satisfactory4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended5. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Saetta Touring 2 | 36,8 | 34,9 | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 | 33,5 | 28,7 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 33,2 | 30,2 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34,9 | 29 | |||||
| Nexen N fera Sport | 33,2 | 30,9 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | 33,4 | 31,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
