Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Premium2. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 Lowcost
Comparison: Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 vs. Michelin Primacy 4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Rotalla) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Rotalla (0%). The first tyre test of Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 was done in 2017, compared to 2019 when was the Michelin Primacy 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the SETULA S-PACE RU01 and the Primacy 4 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01
| Michelin Primacy 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Highly recommended2. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Recommended2. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Michelin Primacy 4 68 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 | 39,8 | 36 | |||||
| Michelin Primacy 4 | 36,2 | 29,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
| Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 | 184 | 76 | 108 | ||||
| Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Highly recommended | 247 | 127 | 120 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
