Segment
1. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Upper-middle2. Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Rotalla) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Rotalla allround tyres are slightly better rated (53%) than Falken (46%). In this particular case, the Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 has a better rating of 53% compared to 48% of the Falken EuroALL Season AS210. The first tyre test of Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Falken EuroALL Season AS210 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 205/55 R16 test, where both the Setula 4 Season RA03 and the EuroALL Season AS210 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Upper-middle2. Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 Lowcost
1. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Exemplary2. Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 Satisfactory
1. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Satisfactory2. Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 | 42,9 | 59,4 | |||||
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210 | 42,7 | 51,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 | 43,3 | 55,5 | |||||
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210 | 44,2 | 50,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||