Segment
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium2. Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Rotalla) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental allround tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Rotalla (53%). In this particular case, the Continental AllSeasonContact has a better rating of 58% compared to 53% of the Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03. The first tyre test of Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Continental AllSeasonContact first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 205/55 R16 test, where both the Setula 4 Season RA03 and the AllSeasonContact were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03
| Continental AllSeasonContact
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium2. Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 Lowcost
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Exemplary2. Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 Satisfactory
1. Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 Satisfactory2. Continental AllSeasonContact Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 | 42,9 | 59,4 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact | 43 | 48,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 | 43,3 | 55,5 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact | 42,6 | 49,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||