Segment
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle2. Riken Snow Lowcost3. Radar Dimax Alpine Lowcost4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle2. Riken Snow Lowcost3. Radar Dimax Alpine Lowcost4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
4. Riken Snow 31.
4. Riken Snow 43.
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.473. Radar Dimax Alpine 25.334. Riken Snow 37.5
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory3. Radar Dimax Alpine Conditionally recommended
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory3. Radar Dimax Alpine Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Riken Snow | 40.8 | - | |||||
| Radar Dimax Alpine | 39.9 | 28.9 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 37.5 | 29.4 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 39.5 | 29.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Riken Snow | 39,1 | - | |||||
| Radar Dimax Alpine | 36,8 | 30,6 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,2 | 29,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Riken Snow | 39,2 | ||||||
| Radar Dimax Alpine | 38,1 | ||||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 37,6 | 26,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | ||||||
| Riken Snow | 37,1 | ||||||
| Radar Dimax Alpine | 40,5 | ||||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,3 | 25,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||