Segment
1. Riken Snow Lowcost2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost3. Radar Dimax Alpine Lowcost
Comparison: Riken Snow vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Radar Dimax Alpine
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
3. Riken Snow 31.
Worst position in test
3. Riken Snow 43.
Average position in tests
2. Radar Dimax Alpine 25.333. Riken Snow 37.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary2. Radar Dimax Alpine Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory2. Radar Dimax Alpine Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
4
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Riken Snow | 40.8 | - | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 38.6 | 29.6 | |||||
| Radar Dimax Alpine | 39.9 | 28.9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Riken Snow | 39,1 | - | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 37,4 | 30,7 | |||||
| Radar Dimax Alpine | 36,8 | 30,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Riken Snow | 39,2 | ||||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Radar Dimax Alpine | 38,1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | ||||||
| Riken Snow | 37,1 | ||||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,3 | 24,5 | |||||
| Radar Dimax Alpine | 40,5 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
