Segment
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle2. Riken Snow Lowcost3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle2. Riken Snow Lowcost3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
4. Riken Snow 31.
4. Riken Snow 43.
3. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.474. Riken Snow 37.5
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Riken Snow | 40.8 | - | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 38.6 | 29.6 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 37.5 | 29.4 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 39.5 | 29.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Riken Snow | 39,1 | - | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 37,4 | 30,7 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,2 | 29,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Riken Snow | 39,2 | ||||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 37,6 | 26,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | ||||||
| Riken Snow | 37,1 | ||||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,3 | 24,5 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,3 | 25,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||